"Voluntary eugenics", ha ha, that is a good one.
Mad Dawg
JoinedPosts by Mad Dawg
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mad Dawg
15 years ago (or so) Algore predicted that we only have 10 years left if we did anything less than everything he said we should do. Well, we are still here.
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
IF GOD WERE A LOVING GOD, WHY DOES HE DO NOTHING ABOUT MY INGROWN TOENAIL!!!!
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
I didn't say I wrote papers for publication, I said I did research.
Actually, you said that you did “scholarly research.” One would presume that this would include a written document of some type.
You are attempting to belittle me and insinuating that any research I might have done is "not scholarly enough" to matter.
Let me state it plainly, you would not have been “belittled” if you hadn’t inflated the nature of your research. You claimed to have done “scholarly research” then resort to whining about “big words.”
You made yourself an easy target.
I got a lot of the materials at the university libraries in Nashville Tennessee. Vanderbilt library was particularly useful. Feel free to go there and start reading.
Don’t need to, we have fine libraries here in New York. I have access to the best libraries in the world.
I did not claim to BE anything.
Semantics. If I claimed to have performed surgery, am I not claiming to be a surgeon? I suppose not if my “surgery” was removing a sliver from my thumb. You implied that you were a scholarly researcher and failed to clarify it. Your problem, not mine.
Just that your reading did not include anyone qualified to comment on theology
And you obtained the list of materials that I studied where?
I didn’t have to obtain the list to know that you didn’t know what you were talking about.
I still haven't seen anyt posts from any of the religionists that even attempted to address Minimus question.
Open your eyes.
Most of the posts in this thread are attacks on me because I posted an example that would focus the discussion on Minimus' question.
So now you are a martyr? Is it more loving to point out your ignorance or to leave you in ignorance?
Now this MD character is saying that I'm not qualified to post an example because I am not a theologan.
You can post any example you want, stop crying because you were unable to defend it – be a big boy.
Your example of gravity is nonsense. Gravity has no will to decide anything. You are clueless regarding theology – you asked.
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
Void said:
By that token, we must admit we know nothing whatever of God, whether he has the notion (let alone any ability) to act, has what we would consider a personality, or any desires at all. By definition, a transcendent God would be utterly alien to us, impossible to fathom, impossible to beseech.
You are very close. The only solution would be if He revealed Himself to us.
Why would a transcendent God care at all?
A very astute question. That is the miracle of God – that He loves us. Life is more good than bad, even in the case of blind children. It can always be worse. It is a paradox that people want God to stay out of their lives, then complain when He does.
Min, I agree that the discussion of Attenborough is immaterial. I was pointing out the ignorance of one who claimed to have done “scholarly research”. His research was so thorough that he didn’t know he was parroting Sir David. There are, of course, no qualifications, to post comments on a subject on this board. But, when one has no clue what they are talking about, I will point it out.
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
Ok, now “Happy” is complaining that I am using big words. I will try to use small words for him. The words do mean something. If you were such a “scholarly” person as you claim you would understand what is meant. BTW, I know you read slow, so I am typing slow for you. Maybe you believe you have done research, but looking for the latest Britany Spears video on Youtube is not real research.
“Happy” said:
I did not categorically state that God is doing nothing for every example that could be given.
Who said you did? Where did they say you said that?
What I did say is that in the example of the river blindness disease, a problem which God directly caused (if you believe in creation) God has done nothing.
And it has been repeatedly (this means over and over again, sorry for the big word) stated that God allows these things to happen for a higher reason.
The religionists claim to know god, I am asking them for what the reasons might be.
You claim to know what a loving God would or wouldn’t do, please explain what He is going to do with you when you die.
To be frank Matt, most of what you say is complete jibberish, you string together complex sounding ideas to impress.
If you had anything resembling a good foundation in theology, nothing I write would be complex sounding or impressive. I hope these words aren’t too big for you.
This kind of 'we can't understand anything" philosophizing is a complete waste of time and shows that your agenda is to impress with big words but not to actually discuss the issue that has been posed.
Who said, “we can't understand anything"? You have saying that if we don’t understand something then the person who allows, or performs it, must be malevolent (click on the link if you don’t understand the word). That would mean that my dog would correctly consider me malevolent for having him castrated (means his nuts were cut off). His understanding, or lack of understanding, of my reason has no bearing on my reasons for my actions – or perceived lack thereof.
My hobby is reading textbooks on various subjects. I am sorry for using such big words. If you need help with a word or phrase, just ask. I am happy to help. Or just look it up, dictionary.com is your friend.
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
“Happy” Guy said:
No, I have not read anything of Attenborough.
This is obvious. Google is your friend.
I am not relying on his argument.
Your ignorance of the source of your argument does not negate the source of said argument.
I used the river blindness example because it is simple, there is no way you can blame man, it is not due to the "evil" of the victims, it does not involve the sovereignty issue, and it could easily be rectified if God chose to do so.
All true and all answered. How do you know what a loving God would do? If you are so sure what a loving God is supposed to do, then what should He do with you when you die? You are the one who claims:
v To know what a loving God would do, and
v To absolutely believe in a god – even if he is not loving
For someone who claims to be so well read, why are you having a problem with this? It should be a simple answer.
I did not make noise about research,…
Ummm, do you remember saying this? I have read hundreds of books from all relgious paradigms. I have done scholarly research on many aspects of the Bible, God, religion, etc.
Sounds like noise to me.
… in answer to someone who assumed that I have never read the Bible and never read ANY religious works by real scholars but instead got all of my information from publications of the WTBTS,
I didn’t say you had done zero research, just that your reading did not include anyone qualified to comment on theology.
I gave a very brief summary of what I actually have done.
Riiiiight, suuure you did. If someone claims to be a vascular surgeon and can’t locate the brachial artery, I am not going to believe them either.
I am still waiting to read some of your “scholarly research.”
Also waiting to know if your beliefs came from aliens. After all, you said: …I have my own spiritual path that did not come from any human or any book. If you are human, it could not have come you. Note the word “ANY.”
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
The reason for suffering may be inscrutable but that does not mean it is gratuitous. Frankly, if God were indeed doing "nothing" this world would be in far worse shape than it is. And there would be far more suffering. To catagorically state that God is doing nothing or that there is no higher reason for something one would have to be God. Again, limiting a transcnending God to the here and now only hinders ones' ability to understand.
-
318
IRAN-Deja vu all over again?
by JWdaughter inany of the rhetoric, demands, conciliation, etc., etc., remind you of anything?
wasn't this all how this war started in iraq?
(or the justification for it, anyway?
-
-
Mad Dawg
Now that Obama is Pres, we should go into Iran because he isn't a cowboy and everyone will know that have good intentions because Obama is not a fundalmentalist hater. Then, we would control everything from Saudi Arabia to Pakistan.
-
392
If God Truly Cared About People Wouldn't He DO SOMETHING By Now?
by minimus ini know what the witness response is to this but what do you say now?.
-
-
Mad Dawg
The quick answer to Min’s question is: to allow a greater good to come out of it. The difficulty that people have is that they want an answer for the here and now regarding a God that transcends time and space.
“Happy” Guy said:
Oh I absolutely believe there is a god and I absolutely hate the mother fucker.
As you clearly have an axe to grind, it is too much to expect any examination of any argument that could possibly shed a positive light on God. I don’t go to haters to get info on another person. Their info is always skewed. If you don’t want anything from anyone, then what is your problem?
Your argument about river blindness originated with Sir David Attenborough. Given the noise you have made about your supposed research and your reliance on his argument, I overestimated your knowledge of Sir David. I will try not to do that again.
Reading books from “all relgious paradigms”? Have you actually read of EVERY paradigm? It is hard for me to take this seriously. Further, it is a waste of time trying to read a book on Buddhism in order to understand Christianity. Maybe I should read John Calvin in order to understand Zoroastrianism? You do know who John Calvin is, right? I don’t want to overestimate your knowledge again.
“Happy” Guy said:
…I have my own spiritual path that did not come from any human or any book.
Are you human? Or did your path come from aliens?
“Happy” Guy said:
I have done scholarly research on many aspects of the Bible, God, religion, etc.
Given your extremely over simplistic view of God and a lack of anything resembling “scholarship” in the style or content of your posts; pfffft! How ‘bout posting some of your “ scholarly research”?
So, just wondering here, what is a loving God supposed to do with you when you die? Being a loving God, is He going to force you to be with someone you hate - for eternity? Maybe He should just let you go, but that wouldn’t be loving, would it? I don’t see a loving God giving you the ultimate disrespect and annihilating you. Gee, what is a loving God to do?